An expectation for your situation*
A doctoral student with a heavy teaching load and little supervision is not held to the standard of someone on a fully funded fellowship. PACE first works out what is realistic for your context.
Self-assessment for doctoral students and postdocs
PACE covers eleven skills of academic life, from research methods and writing to supervision and funding. You rate yourself, and PACE sets your answers against what is realistic for someone with your field, funding, workload and support.
The PACE model
| Skill | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11Funding & Grant Acquisition | D: Funding Literacy | E: Application Writing | F: Full Cycle Experience | G: Funded Independence | H: Portfolio Development | |||
| 10Peer Review & Editorial Service | D: Reviewer Initiation | E: Reliable Reviewing | F: Editorial Contribution | G: Editorial Standing | H: Editorial Leadership | |||
| 9Publication Strategy & Management | C: Outlet Awareness | D: Independent Submission | E: Pipeline Management | F: Portfolio Coherence | G: Research Profile | H: Field Visibility | ||
| 8Science Communication & Outreach | C: Accessible Presentation | D: Format Versatility | E: Stakeholder Dialogue | F: Impact Positioning | G: Outreach Initiative | H: Transfer Leadership | ||
| 7Academic Citizenship & Service | B: Active Participation | C: Defined Service Role | D: Collegial Contribution | E: External Engagement | F: Field Presence | G: Community Stewardship | H: Field Representation | |
| 6Student & Research Supervision | B: Project Supervision | C: Bachelor Supervision | D: Master Supervision | E: Doctoral Co-Supervision | F: Primary PhD Supervision | G: Concurrent Supervision | ||
| 5Teaching & Course Development | B: Session Support | C: Session Delivery | D: Module Contribution | E: Course Responsibility | F: Curriculum Input | G: Curriculum Design | ||
| 4Scholarly Reasoning & Contribution | A: Gap Identification | B: Literature Positioning | C: Framework Building | D: Contribution Framing | E: Theoretical Critique | F: Conceptual Extension | ||
| 3Research Methods & Design | A: Method Familiarisation | B: Design Justification | C: Rigorous Execution | D: Quality Assurance | E: Method Adaptation | F: Methodological Breadth | ||
| 2Academic Writing Craft | A: Scholarly Register | B: Sustained Argument | C: Manuscript Preparation | D: Revision Competence | E: Efficient Production | |||
| 1Research Planning & Self-Management | A: Task Tracking | B: Timeline Construction | C: Adaptive Replanning | D: Long-Term Follow-Through |
A doctoral student with a heavy teaching load and little supervision is not held to the standard of someone on a fully funded fellowship. PACE first works out what is realistic for your context.
The first view uses your career stage, field and funding. The second adds your workload and the support you get, so you can see what those two contribute.
A roadmap orders the eleven skills by how far you are from that expectation, with a concrete next step for the ones at the top.
A few short pages in this order, and your evaluation appears straight after the last one.
Career stage, when your PhD started, work experience before it, and any extension for parental leave or care.
Country, discipline, the profile of your institution and how your work has been funded.
An interactive overview of the eleven skills and their levels, so you know what the statements refer to.
Statements describing each level of the eleven skills, each answered yes or no.
Teaching, job and family commitments alongside your research, and how much support you get from your supervisor, peers and network.
Your answers next to the expectation for your context, in both views, followed by the roadmap.
Each skill appears twice: where you placed yourself, and where someone in your situation typically stands. The skills where the two are furthest apart are where the roadmap begins.
The expectation comes from a statistical model. Its inputs are the context you describe. Its output is where people with that context typically place themselves on each skill. The weights are estimated from a reference population, not set by hand.
The model treats a missing supervisor differently depending on career stage. For a doctoral student it is a real gap in support, while for a professor it is the normal state.
Your responses are collected for research purposes only. They are handled anonymously and are not shared with third parties.
No. You can start right away. At the end you can register to keep your results. Without an account you will not be able to return to them later.
Mainly doctoral students and postdocs. Research associates and professors can take it too, because the model takes career stage into account.
That is expected. Some skills, like supervision or funding, only become relevant later in a research career. The expectation for your career stage already reflects that, so a low rating there does not count against you.
Plan for 10 to 15 minutes in one sitting. If the page stays idle for more than about 20 minutes, the session ends and you have to start again.
Yes. Switch the language at the top of this page, and the assessment follows.
10 to 15 minutes, no account needed.